Should doctors and nurses, like judges, be subject to a "life-long responsibility system"?
Should doctors and nurses, like judges, be subject to a "life-long responsibility system"?
You pay 10 RMB for one visit for hypertension or diabetes and the doctor is supposed to treat you for life. You go to a restaurant for 15 dollars and the chef is supposed to keep you fed for life?
Health care workers should be held accountable for life. If at the time of your birth, a health care worker doesn't see that you will have a heart attack, high blood pressure, diabetes or even a tumor in the future, and lets you be born, then that health care worker has definitely misdiagnosed you and must be sentenced to prison.
Diseases can recur and cases don't, and you can't generalize.
This is a bold and avant-garde question you are asking. Because as of now, no precedent has been seen, internationally or domestically, that stipulates that healthcare professionals are responsible for their medical behavior for life within the scope of their practice. So let's discuss the following discussion, why judges can be responsible for life? At present, China's health care workers are responsible for their practice behavior for a few years? In the future, can our health care workers, like judges, also be responsible for their professional behavior for life within the scope of their duties?
Our judges are responsible for their cases for life, and there is a law to support it
There is a legal basis for the implementation of the system of lifelong responsibility of judges for handling cases in China. According to article 25 of the Supreme Court's Opinions on Improving the System of Judicial Responsibility of the People's Courts, judges should be held accountable for their actions in the performance of their judicial duties, and should be held responsible for the quality of the cases they handle for the rest of their lives within the scope of their duties.
Not only judges, but also prosecutors are subject to a system of lifelong responsibility for the handling of cases. According to article 32 of the Supreme Procuratorate's Opinions on Improving the Judicial Accountability System of People's Procuratorates, procurators shall be held judicially accountable for their actions in the performance of their procuratorial duties, and shall be held responsible for the quality of the cases they handle for the rest of their lives within the scope of their duties.

How many years are our healthcare professionals responsible for their medical practices?
So far, China's medical-related laws and regulations, such as the Regulations on the Administration of Medical Institutions, the Regulations on the Handling of Medical Accidents, and so on, have not stipulated the number of years that a healthcare worker is responsible for his or her practice within the scope of his or her practice.
Only paragraph 31.2 of the Nurses' Regulations mentions that nurses who cause medical accidents in their practice shall be held legally responsible in accordance with the relevant provisions on the handling of medical accidents. However, there is also no provision for a specific number of years of responsibility.
At present, it is usually recognized that the statute of limitations for medical malpractice is three years, and if the law stipulates otherwise, it shall be in accordance with its provisions. The legal basis for this is article 188 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, which states that the statute of limitations for requesting protection of civil rights from the people's court shall be three years. Where the law provides otherwise, it shall do so in accordance with its provisions.
The maximum number of years is more than 20 from the date when the patient's rights are jeopardized, the people's court will not protect; in special cases, the people's court may decide to extend the period on the basis of the application of the right holder.
Therefore, at present, the number of years that our health care workers are responsible for their practice within the scope of their practice is normally three years, and the maximum is 20 years.

Can healthcare professionals practice lifelong accountability for professional behavior?
So, can doctors and nurses, like judges and prosecutors, also realize a life-long responsibility system in the near future? I personally think thatunlikelyThe reasons are as follows:
1. medical practice is by its very nature an empirical discipline.Just like athletes, the greatest athletes in the world, such as Jordan, can't guarantee that he won't commit a foul every time he plays because that's all he can do to make sure he doesn't commit a foul.
2. the scope of medical practice includes the assumption of unknown risks.Even if he is one of our country's top doctors, he cannot guarantee that he has a complete grasp of the patient's condition, in which the hidden unknown condition is a risk that needs to be shared by the hospital and the family.
3. The object of medical behavior is human life, which cannot be repeated.For any person, life is only once and cannot be repeated. This is unlike the case of a judge or prosecutor; there is no such thing as revocation, restitution. Whether it is a minor illness or a life-saving injury, once the act of treatment is created, it can never be restored to its original state.
Based on the above 3 points, I personally think that even in the future, it is unlikely that health care workers will be held accountable for life, as in the case of judges and prosecutors.
Do you agree with me?
What is the purpose of practicing tenure? Is it to enable patients to come back to the health care personnel after an unknown number of years when their health deteriorates? If this is the case, the patient should go to the health care personnel regularly throughout his life to report to the health care personnel, to do physical examination, in strict accordance with the doctor's advice to manage health, only by doing so, the lifelong system is reasonable, to go to the bank to withdraw money away from the counter are not responsible, the patient wants to be detached from the health care supervision and control still want to clutch the wool of the health care personnel that is a beautiful thought!
All visits must be covered by lifetime insurance or they will not be accepted
The only person in China who had this treatment in history was the emperor, who forced doctors to sign a lifetime responsibility. Legendary famous doctors in history never dared to go and treat the emperor because Hua Tuo had Cao Cao killed.
So some of our Chinese men really like to think of themselves as emperors! They don't even look at the fact that it's a people's republic and everyone is equal.
Should doctors and nurses, like judges, be subject to a life-long responsibility system? Is it naive for those who have such an idea?1. The door of the hospital is always open. You have registered once for a doctor's visit, and you want the doctors and nurses to serve you for life. Are you afraid of going to the hospital without a doctor? Or do you not want to register for a second time in this life? 2. Doctors have careers, and rarely have a break, you want a doctor to serve you for life, so that the doctor to your main, you're fine when the doctor then go to work? You think healthcare is like your family's sedan that fires up whenever you need it. Health care is also a person, also have their own lives, health care just learn a little more medical knowledge, other and you are no different. 3. current medical technology, some diseases can be cured, many diseases can not yet be cured, so that the health care "lifelong responsibility", you mean that the disease is not cured, that is, the doctor is negligent, the doctor needs to continue to be responsible for the chant, if a patient with leukemia for a year, the doctor should be responsible for the doctor to continue to be responsible for the doctor to continue to be responsible for the disease. If a leukemia patient, a year did not cure, according to your "lifetime responsibility system", is the health care negligence, the second year but also continue to serve you free of charge, the third year but also continue until the end of the hanging, health care or dereliction of duty, whether or not you also want to compensate you for the cost of health care? A lifetime can not find the court door, but how many people have never been to the hospital in their lives? Even more than once or twice to deal with the hospital. Can these two professions be compared? It's like when you buy a car and spend 100,000 dollars and say it's not expensive, but when you go to buy a dress and spend 10,000 dollars, can you say it's not expensive? What do you think, friends? Feel free to share your views together!

Images from the Internet, if any infringement contact to remove!
I'm Pediatrician Raindrops, follow me and I'll help you learn more medical tidbits!
This question is really brain-dead. According to the questioner, is it the case that a patient who was sick at the age of 20 and was cured by a certain doctor, and then suffered a relapse at the age of 60, should hold a certain doctor responsible? Is it that the questioner has already tasted the sweetness of medical malpractice, and wants to keep on malpracticing?
Now the "three highs" and malignant tumors as the main chronic disease is the mainstream, many diseases are the patient's own "make" out of the Neijing so-called "to wine as pulp, to delusion for the regular", is it! Do you want to pay for the doctor who saw you once for hypertension 20 years ago? This is really bullshit!
This question and answer are from the site users, does not represent the position of the site, such as infringement, please contact the administrator to delete.