Treatment and cure are a million miles apart.

To talk about treatment, AIDS has stepped into the era of chronic disease since the invention of cocktail therapy by He Daichi. Therefore, the prescriptions and therapies for treating AIDS do not need to be publicized by anyone, there are dozens of combinations all over the world, together with long-acting drugs and so on, there are even close to a hundred combinations of drugs and treatments. Since the 21st Century, even in Africa, after receiving regular treatment, the life expectancy can be very close to that of an ordinary person. In the case of East Asians, where treatment is very standardized, or Europeans and Americans, where drugs are very advanced, life expectancy can reach 80 years.

(Figure 1. Life expectancy of HIV-positive men and women on ART at age 20 under different ART calendar cycles)

The only dilemma is: the medicine can't be cut off.

Because of the viral reservoir, it causes the treatment of AIDS to become like diabetes, to be maintained for a lifetime.

So, if the title becomes, if someone had a cure for AIDS would they make it public?

The answer is no, because Gilead/viiv/Pfizer/GlaxoSmithKline and other AIDS drug companies have many, many more treatments on their hands, such as taf, a recently launched AIDS treatment that is claimed to have no side-effects, uses a lot less dosage than tenofovir, is much more potent, and has a negligible impact on the kidneys as well as bone density. But the drug's launch comes at a time when tenofovir is almost ready to be liberalized for generic use.

So, the pharmaceutical giants are probably the ones that the questioner is referring to as "the ones that have the AIDS treatment/cure in their hands".

Capital comes into the world dripping blood and filth from every pore, from head to toe. For 100 percent profit it tramples on all earthly laws; with 300 percent profit it dares to commit any crime, even at the risk of hanging. --Marx, Capital

Therefore, it is impossible for an individual to grasp a cure for a century-old problem like AIDS, and scientific talents in these directions are locked up by these giants before they even graduate.

Leaving aside the question of whether or not this person is capable of researching it, assuming that he has really performed a miracle and found a prescription for the treatment of AIDS, it would be a piece of waste paper if he holds it in his hands. Only by treating AIDS patients can this prescription be worth a lot of money.

Besides, this kind of public, and not let him unconditional gift, he can cooperate with the pharmaceutical company, do not care about reputation, can make a lot of money, not to say the richest man in the world, at least the richest man in the region is no problem at all. Care about reputation, but also just need to set the price of the drug a little bit more affordable, the same can make money, reputation and wealth are there, why not.

Isn't it well illustrated in the movie "I am not the God of Medicine" that despite the expensive life-saving medicines produced by pharmaceutical companies, many patients have to sell their houses to buy the medicines just the same in order to stay alive. With a prescription for a disease that the whole world can't conquer, and you still can't make any money, that only means you want to be a saint.

If one sees that someone else has a prescription for AIDS and asks him to give it away unconditionally, this is probably treating the other person as a saint. Although "I Am Not the God of Medicine" is criticizing the drug companies, it is actually clear to anyone familiar with drug research that the drug companies' upfront investment is also huge, and if they do it for the public good, there basically won't be a next life-saving drug being developed.

The last thing is to come back to the topic of the thread, if you are trying to refer to a person who developed such a remedy, save your breath! If AIDS was really that easy to conquer, why have so many drug companies, medical doctors, and research labs around the world not made much progress until now!

If you tell me it's some herbal remedy, then forget I said anything.

Nowadays, even if people say that the cure, free and open no one believes, must go through the media experts and celebrities advertisements, on the system did not work will also be believed.

It doesn't matter if it's public or not if the question is about the prescription for those herbs, it doesn't help anyway.

Since the day AIDS appeared in China, there have been many such recipes, and I have received many people who claimed that they had ancestral recipes or that the treatment of AIDS was extinct, but what are the ancestral recipes? The emergence of HIV less than 100 years, your ancestors have not even heard of it, where there is a secret recipe? They are obviously here to rub the traffic of AIDS.

To the modern era of medicine, you can not say can cure us let you try, not cure or serious side effects, you slipped, AIDS people how to do? Whether HIV-infected or AIDS patients, they are human beings, not experimental animals. Even if it is a test subject, it is also for AIDS research, not for the people's science and fraudsters to stand with.

After all these years, have any of those herbal remedies claiming to cure AIDS worked except to scam money and investments and stockholders?

Speaking of this, I recall a past event. Back then, there was a person who was also the No. 1 figure in the medical profession, who was superstitious about qigong, and who was dead set on recommending qigong masters to treat AIDS, and my mentor could not carry on any longer, so he had to agree to let the qigong masters come and give it a try.

A few qigong masters came that day, and we prepared HIV-infected cells in advance and put them in culture bottles, part of which was used as a control, and the other part of which the qigong masters were allowed to send out their gongs.

Qigong masters in turn, respectively, on several bottles of cells hair Gong, we are curious, lying down on the laboratory window to see. It was the turn of a middle-aged male qigong master, carrying a military satchel there. Laboratory of an older sister surprised: this person I know, together with the insertion of the army, and later because of mental illness, retired back to the city.

What are the results of this trial of qigong against HIV?

It was ineffective.

I will. Isn't it for the sake of mankind that Li Shizhen wrote the Compendium of Materia Medica with his life's work? Money is nothing, life is only one life, leave the merit to the future generations.

It's out in the open! Those who believe it are almost nonexistent! Because it's stereotyped in their minds! The infection must be taken for life! Everything else is a scam to get money! But there are people who do use this to cheat people out of money! It needs to be promoted by official forces to make it work! If