Does a child born to an AIDS patient have to have AIDS?
It does not necessarily depend on the specific situation, mothers who are finishing antiretroviral treatment, viral load can not be measured, under the guidance of a professional doctor, it is possible to get pregnant, and the child is born to receive medication blockade, the success rate of blockade is now quite high, AIDS patients also have the right to be a mother, if it is found that the infection of AIDS during pregnancy, it must be even if the antiretroviral treatment, there are professional doctors for If HIV infection is detected during pregnancy, antiretroviral treatment must be given even if possible, and a specialized doctor will conduct an evaluation and make a decision in conjunction with the patient.
Mother-to-child inheritance is one of the ways of transmission of ETS, the probability is not clear! It's better not to take this risk if you have children!
Is the child born to an AIDS patient definitely AIDS? This is not absolute, but the chances of transmission to the baby will be greater, and can not be controlled with drugs, basically rely on chance, so AIDS women pregnant do not wrestle, it is best to not have children.
HIV can be transmitted from mother to fetus, but it is not hereditary. This happens because HIV is found in blood, semen, vaginal secretions, pleural and abdominal fluid, cerebrospinal fluid and breast milk. Therefore, if a mother is infected with HIV, she can pass it on to her child through the placenta during pregnancy, through labor and delivery during a normal birth or cesarean section, or through breastfeeding. Mother-to-child transmission is an important route of HIV transmission, and many children are infected with HIV through this behavior.
That is why mother-to-child interruption is currently recommended for AIDS patients or AIDS carriers, and childbearing is only recommended for those who have undergone mother-to-child interruption.
If the pregnancy is accidental, the mother-to-child interruption during pregnancy is timely, depending on the level of medical care in different places, if the problem is not too big, you should be able to give birth to a healthy child. But I think if you know you have this disease, it is best not to take the risk of the child, not pregnant is the best choice, but also responsible for the future of the child, after all, the child is still small in case of infection is a lifetime of suffering, as a parent to be more heartbreaking ah. So it's better to think carefully about the child before making a decision.
This question and answer are from the site users, does not represent the position of the site, such as infringement, please contact the administrator to delete.