Only two days ago, I just came into contact with a group of AIDS patients, shaking hands with them and chatting with them, and they were all very normal. However, it looked as if they were rather thin, but their conditions were quite well controlled, and they were doing some anti-viral cocktail therapy.

What else can I say about this Guiyang thing, if you ask me? It's not really easy to answer becauseThe ones with real ideas and opinions are trying to make a living and don't have time to read them.

A netizen once asked what he should do when he took his girlfriend to dinner and encountered hooligans whistling at his girlfriend. Some replied: If you are less than 20 years old, you should rush over and fight, if you are over that age, you shouldTime to work hard to earn money and take her to a more upscale restaurant where there are no hooligans.

△The more typical AIDS patient circulating on the Internet, with a thin body

In fact, and this paragraph is similar, very realistic, I know people, someone inside the family is sick, many are brought to a better hospital to see a doctor, and even to Beijing to visit famous doctors and hospitals, Guiyang's health care, education, compared to Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, these places, underdeveloped is not a day or two things, talent, technology, not to build a building, such as a piece of soft power to do a strong up, and the lack of accumulation of a couple of generations may still be very difficult. Without the accumulation of a generation or two, it may still be difficult.

The Q&A community has a thread asking:How good is Peking Union Medical College Hospital?You can go through it and see where the gap is.

If you ask me.Instead of spending your time and your life waiting for others and expecting the environment to get better, you should take the initiative yourself!, for example, a friend said outright that if her family member got sick, she would considerSend your family to a tertiary hospital in a developed areaand less likely to choose a local hospital in your state.

Why Chengdu has attracted an influx of population over the past few years, in fact, let's not forget thatStatus of West China HospitalIt is also pivotal in the medical community.

Kaposi's sarcoma, a complication of △AIDS

After all, there are too many people in China, and when there are too many people and limited medical resources, hospitals and doctors will be very busy, and in the midst of the busyness, it is an individual who may make mistakes, even if subjectively they can not allow mistakes to happen.Consideration of the objective status quo, and that even if the dividends from advances in medical technology are large, spread over you as an individual, they're still very thin.For example, if you go to the hospital to get a specialist's number, there's always a line, there's always a commute time limit.

To occupy the ideal resources in a place with such a large population, the first thing you should do is to make money, a lot of money, so that your family, your loved ones, may enjoy better healthcare and education resources.

It's like a classic line from I Am Not a Drug God:There is only one disease in the world, the disease of poverty!

So don't blame this or that, you'll blame yourself, not anyone else. Anyway, the way I look at it is.A lot of the problem, in fact, to put it bluntly, is moneyThe most important thing is that even between the closest parents and children, people have limitations, while the driving force of capital is beyond the imagination of many people, there is a saying is not that the family loves you, bedridden for three years to try? If you have more friends, try borrowing 500,000 dollars?There is no filial son in the bed of the long-sick!

For Guiyang this HIV infection, it seems that the results of any definitive investigation is not yet available, but as a general public, I do not dare to have any other opinion.The only way to look at it is that all of these various incidents are incentives for me to make more money, to avoid my family and household, from facing the same dilemma, or, when faced with a similar dilemma, to not put to the test the most fundamental human nature among my loved ones, and to not bend and compromise against my heart, because of money.

There is still a high probability that this child contracted HIV in the hospital, as the exclusionary method has already based the evidence of infection in the hospital on lockdown.

A two-year-old child with healthy parents, it is reasonable to assume that the likelihood of direct high-risk contact between this child and an outside HIV patient is virtually unlikely to exist, and his only history of blood transfusion was performed at the Guizhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital.

Furthermore, hospital blood supplies are traceable. Just find the donor directly and check his blood. It really isn't that hard to confirm the diagnosis, and if that donor is dead, then the hospital should have kept medical records as well. AIDS is a wasting disease, and it doesn't usually come on suddenly and is hastily cremated without leaving any medical records.

For this child heartache. A throat incident, leading to such a disaster, foreign body stuck in the throat leading to the death of infants and young children is not uncommon, with children, two-year-old children , teeth are not full grown, do not dare to feed into pieces of hard apples, more on the heart it!

My mother had a history of blood transfusions when she was sick and hospitalized. At that time cases of HIV infection from blood transfusions were rampant. I raised this concern with the doctor when I signed the papers. When I donated blood, I found that the blood stations did not conduct any health checks on the donors and just collected the blood. Therefore, I have always had misgivings: How can we ensure that the blood collected is free of all kinds of infectious poisons?

The doctor told me that the plasma is tested once when it comes in and again when it comes in at the hospital.

This is the best hospital in Qingdao. It uses countless amounts of blood for surgeries every day, and has never heard of any accidents due to blood transfusion in this hospital.

Therefore, the safety of medical treatment is closely related to the level of hospitals.

The child treatment hospital, in the local area is also a regional center hospital, the child stuck in the throat of this emergency, can not choose, can only run close to a good hospital to go, and maternal and child health hospitals, and should be on the young children foreign body stuck in the throat of this common disease have enough experience in dealing with, so the child into the hospital at that time, can be said to have no choice.

If it can be ascertained that the child was infected by blood transfusion in the hospital, the hospital is liable for medical compensation. But what is the significance of paying more compensation as opposed to destroying the child and the whole family?

Therefore, the only correct approach is for the hospital to face the facts and actively resolve the problem. Passing the buck will only make the patients more disappointed and angry and make the situation more serious.

In reality there are people who just don't believe in evil and must make a big deal out of things before they are willing to face and resolve them.

Like the old rogue.

AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) that is mainly transmitted through sexual intercourse, blood transfusion, and mother-to-child transmission. Neither of the parents are HIV carriers, which negates the possibility of the girl getting AIDS through mother-to-child transmission. The little girl is only two years old, so it is impossible for her to have sex, which also negates the possibility of her getting AIDS through sexual intercourse. Through the above analysis, the only way for the little girl to get AIDS is through blood transfusion. The state authorities should investigate and collect evidence in time, and publicize the truth in due course to eliminate the public's suspicion. If the hospital staff was negligent, they should be punished according to the law to enhance the trust between doctors and patients. Strengthen the management, to avoid the tragedy to happen again, to prevent the slightest and prevent the gradual.

I think the blood donor should be tested. Because in the window period or latent period of AIDS, it is possible that the test may not show AIDS. It may just be assumed that it is a healthy person and that it was done on the blood station according to normal procedures without problems. If the person can be found to have AIDS, then everything is understood. Then who is responsible. Everyone is doing it according to normal procedures, who is responsible. Blame it on the fact that medicine is not yet developed, let people comment on this. This society is very repetitive.

We don't know what went wrong in this case.，It's currently being investigated by the NHMRC. It usually takes 10 days.We await the conclusion of the investigation.。

Whereas our currentBlood Quality Managementstipulates that the blood test alone involves eight tests for ABO blood group, RhD blood group, hemoglobin, aminotransferases, human immunodeficiency (AIDS) virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, syphilis spirochetes, and so on.Of these, three items, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus, are subject to both serologic and nucleic acid testing。

Unfortunate and unsolved

I'd like to start by offering a possibility:There's a form of AIDS that's transmitted by blood transfusion that's extremely dangerous and has no cure worldwide.That's what I'm talking about.window period infection。There are some people that shouldn't be giving blood.

It's happened in the past.In 2015, a girl in Fujian was infected with HIV through a surgical blood transfusion, and it was investigated that it was the blood of an HIV-infected person in the window period that had been entered.

window period infection

After we are infected with certain pathogens, it takes a certain amount of time for us to produce the appropriate antibodies, and some of the current targeted tests for pathogens detect our antibodies, so there exists such a period ofThe time "before we can produce antibodies" is called the window period.。At this point, although antibodies cannot be measured, the infected person is already contagious.

HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis CWindow periods exist for infectious diseases such as

And the blood taken during the window period.Leaving it for a while to check doesn't check it either.This is because HIV antibodies, which are checked by current technology, can only be produced in an infected person.When the blood is drawn the TA hasn't produced the antibodies yet, then there will never be antibodies in the blood.

window period bloodWorldwideIt's all difficult, in terms of human and material resources, which are currentlyinsoluble (i.e. unable to solve)The.

The World Health Organization's strategy is:Excluding high-risk groups from donating blood and recruiting non-remunerated blood donors from low-risk groups。

Emphasis on excluding high-risk groups from the blood donation process

Many countries are straight across the board, mandating "No blood donations from high-risk groups".

High-risk groups are referred to as:

• Having multiple sexual partners;
  

• Prostitution and patronizing prostitutes;
  

• Male-to-male sex;
  

• Injecting drugs (sharing needles);
  

• Tattoos;
  

• Sexual intercourse with a person who engages in the above behaviors;
  

• Have traveled for a short period of time to an infected area with a high incidence of certain infectious diseases;
  

• Occupational exposure has occurred in a short period of time, etc.

However, "high-risk group" is not written on the face, and the staff of the blood stations may not have time to investigate whether the other party is lying or not, so when it comes to the implementation in reality, weOften you can only rely on the character of the people at risk, on their conscious。

For those at risk, please go to the proper place for testing

I was writing my answer to a random Baidu and I realized that on various medical Q&A sites, people were asking if they could rely on the safety test of blood donation to rule out whether they had HIV, and many of the free answers were, "Yes, blood donation will check for HIV and notify you if you find out you have the infection."

These people know that they have engaged in high-risk behaviors and spend their days in fear, and for various reasons, they refuse to go to the formal channels to test for diseases, but instead, they want to make use of the mechanism of blood donation at blood stations to check for diseases.

Such behavior is highly irresponsible, and while blood stations do return information about blood diseases in donors, theBlood stations don't detect window period problems。

The real test, or the need forGo to the hospital or the CDC.In order to avoid delays, it is important to listen to your doctor's advice so that you can guarantee that you will be diagnosed and receive treatment in a timely manner.

At-risk people who go to donate blood to test for disease are harming themselves and society!

Not only that.If a donor donates blood and then detects an infectious disease, or recalls that he or she had high-risk behaviors, both should bePromptly notify the blood station that the blood you have donated cannot be usedThe blood stations are required to treat blood confidentially while protecting the privacy of the donor.

It is a remedy for those who are at high risk of mistakenly donating blood, otherwise it would be tantamount to a straw man. But the reality is that there are still very few people willing to contact blood stations for confidential blood abandonment.

Feel free to like, follow, and discuss with me

Really heartbroken for this child and this family, 10,000 points for the child and the parents. How will his parents take it when the child is infected with HIV at such a young age? The child is still unaware of the disease and has started his painful life. Watching this kind of news, while feeling sad, I still hope that the blood test technology is higher, so that the latent HIV can be detected. I hope that people will clean themselves up and not let AIDS spread. I hope that the world's medical level will be higher, so that AIDS can be eliminated forever.

The HIV infection of the child is not responsible for saying that the hospital is responsible, and it is not responsible for saying that it is not responsible, after all, the child was infected in your place. In addition to the blood transfusion could also be infected by medical equipment. But I know this lawsuit is not good.

I was in the hospital when I had my baby and because my husband was busy, he didn't make it. I just signed the consent form for my surgery myself. There were so many clauses about possible death, and I wasn't particularly scared because I'd already had a cesarean section once. But what I was most afraid of was that the hospital had nothing to do with me contracting AIDS during the blood transfusion, and that the hospital would not be responsible for it! I said, "I don't have AIDS, I've just been tested, and I've been tested three times during my pregnancy, so if I get infected during the surgery, how can it have nothing to do with you guys and you're not responsible?" The doctor explained to me, "Because HIV has a one-month incubation period in the blood. For example, if a person has been infected with HIV, but during the incubation period, it cannot be detected by a blood test, so when the person goes to donate blood, the blood is drawn as if it were a normal person's healthy blood. As a result, the patient is infected with HIV when the faulty blood is given to him, and the hospital does not know that the blood is faulty, so the hospital is not responsible for it.

At the time I listened, I was overwhelmed. I began to understand my husband's anxiety and hesitation in signing the papers when I had my oldest child. Seeing that the surgery was just a few hours away, and I was a senior mother and O-negative, I had to have blood on hand. What if I needed a blood transfusion and it was a bigger problem if I didn't sign? I could only be ruthless and sign.

When my husband came over he went to the inpatient check-in desk and paid another $10,000 to bring up the spare plasma. When the child came out, I asked the chief surgeon if he needed a blood transfusion. The director said, "No, what blood transfusion, you are in such a good state, bleeding xxx milliliters of blood, bleeding that little bit of blood for this surgery is not even a flow." My heart dropped then, and I forgot how much blood the doctor said I had lost. But all in all, luckily the c-section didn't involve any blood transfusion for either child.

So reading about this incident with the kids, sad for them, but not sure what to do about it. Hospital waivers abound and HIV does have a latency period. There is nothing but heartache and a sigh of relief when you read news like this!

So blessings to all for good health and as little sickness and blood transfusions as possible!

It feels like it was caused by a blood transfusion!

My son had human albumin.

It's scary to think about!